WBS 02

System & Schedule Audit

A Primavera P6 schedule audit answers a simple question: would this programme survive scrutiny — from management, from the client, from a claims consultant? A system audit asks the same question of the environment around it: are the structures, security and data quality helping your teams, or quietly working against them?

I do both, separately or together, as an independent reviewer with no stake in the answer.

AS FOUND 3 FINDINGS AFTER THE FIX LIST LOGIC OK A200 A210 A220 TF −12d — logic forces the dates A230 A240 A250 hard constraint ≤ 15-Mar A260 ? open end — no successor A200 A210 A230 A240 MS-01 ✓ closed network — every path reaches the milestone float means something again: TF +8d
The audit in one picture: findings on the left, a network that models reality on the right — connected by a prioritised fix list.

Schedule audit

The schedule review goes beyond a mechanical DCMA 14-point pass: open ends, negative float, constraint abuse, unrealistic durations and lags, calendar inconsistencies, baseline integrity, progress-update discipline — and, more importantly, whether the network actually models how the work will be built. A schedule can pass every metric and still be fiction; the difference shows in the logic.

The output is not a scorecard for its own sake: it is a prioritised fix list your planners can act on immediately, with the reasoning explained so the same issues do not reappear next month.

System audit

On the environment side I review the structures (EPS/OBS, codes, calendars), security and user setup, data quality across projects, and actual usage patterns — who really works in the system and who works around it. Fifteen years of implementations make the common failure patterns quick to recognise.

Findings land in an improvement roadmap ordered by effort-to-impact: what to fix this week, what to schedule, what to leave alone. If the roadmap leads to reconfiguration or a reporting layer, you can take it to anyone — including, if you wish, me.

Confidentiality

Audit work means seeing programmes and data your competitors would love to see. I work under NDA as a matter of course, including for defence-sector clients where the requirements are stricter still — a large part of my track record is in that sector precisely because confidentiality discipline is non-negotiable there.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What do you need from us to start?

For a schedule audit: XER/XML exports and one call for project context. For a system audit: read access to the environment (or a database backup) and short interviews with key users. Both can be done fully remotely.

How long does an audit take?

A single-programme schedule audit is typically days, not weeks. Environment audits scale with the number of projects and users — scoped honestly after the first look.

Can this support a claim or dispute?

The audit gives you an independent, documented assessment of schedule quality, which is often the starting point. Formal delay analysis for disputes is a separate engagement — tell me the context and I will say plainly whether I am the right person for it.

Not sure which service fits?

A short call is enough to scope it — no obligations, no hard sell.

Book a call →
Message on WhatsApp