R-29: DCMA 14-Point Assessment Report
Data Date: 28 Feb 2026
DCMA 14-Point Schedule Assessment
Federal Highway Interchange Reconstruction — Submission 3 of 4 — Schedule Quality Gate Review
ProjectI-94 / US-30 Interchange Reconstruction
ContractorMeridian Infrastructure Group
Submission3 of 4
Data Date28 Feb 2026
Total Activities1,847
Review Deadline14 Mar 2026
Overall Score
12/14
Pass rate: 85.7%
Prior Submission
10/14
Submission 2 — Dec 2025
First Submission
8/14
Submission 1 — Sep 2025
Persistent Fails
2
Hard Constraints & Resources
Acceptance Threshold
13/14
Required for contract acceptance
12/14
Submission 3
Score Trend — Submissions 1–3
Acceptance threshold (13/14)
8
Sub 1
Sep 2025
10
Sub 2
Dec 2025
12
Sub 3
Feb 2026
?
Sub 4
Target
14-Point Metric Assessment
# Metric Threshold Score Status Submission Trend (1→2→3)
1 Logic — Missing Predecessors ≤ 5% 2.1% PASS
2 Logic — Missing Successors ≤ 5% 1.8% PASS
3 Leads — Negative Lag 0% 0.0% PASS
4 Lags — Positive Lag ≤ 5% 3.4% PASS
5 Relationship Types — FS % ≥ 90% 93.2% PASS
6 Hard Constraints ≤ 5% 8.7% FAIL
7 High Float — TF > 44d ≤ 5% 4.3% PASS
8 Negative Float 0% 0.0% PASS
9 High Duration — OD > 44d ≤ 5% 2.9% PASS
10 Invalid Dates (Actual Future / Forecast Past) 0 0 PASS
11 Resources — Activities with Assignments ≥ 90% 81.4% FAIL
12 Missed Tasks (BL Finish < DD, no Actual) 0% 0.0% PASS
13 Critical Path Test (Longest Path = End) Pass Pass PASS
14 Critical Path Length Index (CPLI) ≥ 1.0 1.08 PASS
Failing Metrics — Root Cause & Remediation Required
FAIL Metric 6 — Hard Constraints (8.7% vs. ≤5% threshold)
161 of 1,847 activities

Hard constraints override schedule logic and can mask float consumption, leading to false schedule confidence. Activities with MFO, MSO, SNET, or FNLT constraints other than project start/end milestones must be justified individually.

Failing Activities (representative sample — 161 total):
Activity ID Activity Name Constraint Type Constraint Date Justification Status
HW-3210 Install Temporary Traffic Signals — Zone 3 MSO 15 Mar 2026 Pending Review
HW-3415 Concrete Barrier Rail — Phase 2B FNLT 30 Apr 2026 No Justification
HW-4102 Structural Steel Erection — Ramp A MSO 01 May 2026 No Justification
HW-5001 Drainage Outfall Tie-In — Sector 7 SNET 01 Mar 2026 Approved (Permit)
HW-5522 Noise Wall Installation — Residential Zone MFO 28 Feb 2027 No Justification
... 156 additional hard-constrained activities require review ...
Required Action: Contractor to provide written justification for each hard constraint within 10 days. Unjustified constraints must be converted to logic ties by Submission 4 to achieve pass.
FAIL Metric 11 — Resources Loaded (81.4% vs. ≥90% threshold)
345 of 1,847 activities unloaded

Resource loading is required by contract NTP-2023-14 Clause 12.4. Unloaded activities undermine cost/resource forecasting capability and prevent earned value analysis integration. Persistent failure across 3 submissions triggers a Contract Notice under Clause 18.

WBS Areas with Highest Unloaded Activity Count:
WBS Code WBS Description Total Activities Unloaded % Unloaded Status
HW.04.02 Pavement Works — Phase 2 187 112 59.9% Critical
HW.05.01 Bridge Deck & Expansion Joints 94 67 71.3% Critical
HW.06.03 Landscaping & Erosion Control 143 88 61.5% Critical
HW.07.01 ITS & Signage Installation 78 78 100% Not Started
Required Action: All activities must be loaded with at minimum a crew-hour resource by Submission 4. This is a persistent Contract Notice condition. Failure will trigger a Schedule Acceptance Hold on payment application.
Assessment Summary — Submission 3

The Submission 3 schedule shows meaningful improvement, advancing from 8/14 to 12/14 passing metrics. Six metrics that previously failed (Logic predecessors/successors, Negative Lag, Missed Tasks, Negative Float, and CPLI) have been successfully remediated. The contractor is commended for the methodical approach to logic corrections.

  • Remaining Gap to Acceptance: One additional metric must pass to meet the contractual acceptance threshold of 13/14 by Submission 4. Metric 6 (Hard Constraints) is the more tractable item — requires documentation, not schedule restructuring.
  • Escalation Risk: Metric 11 (Resources) has now failed in all 3 submissions. Under Contract Clause 18.2, a formal Schedule Compliance Notice will be issued by 14 Mar 2026 if a remediation plan is not submitted.
  • CPLI Status: CPLI of 1.08 is marginally passing. Any schedule slippage of >2 weeks to the critical path could push CPLI below 1.0 — monitor closely through April 2026 peak construction period.
  • Submission 4 Target: 13/14 minimum, with Hard Constraints the priority. Resources must show ≥88% loading (trajectory to 90% acceptable).